| |
Ang v. Teodoro
[74 Phil 50 (1942)]
The function of a trade-mark is to point distinctively, either
by its own meaning or by association, to the origin or ownership
of the wares to which it is applied. "Ang Tibay,"
as used by the respondent to designate his wares, had exactly
performed that function for twenty-two years before the petitioner
adopted it as a trade-mark in her own business. "Ang
Tibay" shoes and slippers are, by association, known
throughout the Philippines as products of the "Ang Tibay"
factory owned and operated by the respondent. Even if "Ang
Tibay," therefore, were not capable of exclusive appropriation
as a trade-mark, the application of the doctrine of secondary
meaning could nevertheless be fully sustained because, in
any event, by respondent's long and exclusive use of said
phrase with reference to his products and his business, it
has acquired a proprietary connotation. This doctrine is to
the effect that a word or phrase originally incapable of exclusive
appropriation with reference to an article on the market,
because geographically or otherwise descriptive, might nevertheless
have been used so long and so exclusively by one producer
with reference to his article that, in that trade and to that
branch of the purchasing public, the word or phrase has come
to mean that the article was his product.
|